Anti-Case:
Radical Honesty

We try so hard to be shiny and chic, it’s slightly comical. But the real connection is where we stumble a bit, and accidentally reveal our lovely little weirdnesses.

In the AI synthetic noise, we should fiercely protect our humanness. So, I want to share this with you: I wrote the wrong novel (see below). But, thank God: iterating works with everything, also wrong stories, but right characters.

Tim Chang, one of Silicon Valley’s top VCs has said: “Vulnerability is the next super power.”

I agree. Our true connection – humanness – is where we dare to be real.

So here we go.

(This only slightly hurts.)

The Plot Twist (the bad kind)
Between 2015–2019 (yes, over four years) I wrote a whole novel script (yes, over 400 pages) about – yes, a global pandemic.

Then, obviously, 2020 happened.

Absolutely no one wants to read fiction about a global pandemic after a global pandemic. (I wouldn’t.)

But I’ll keep the humans
The story is gone, but I still love the characters. To my joy, so does my publisher. They are grumpy old Northern Finnish men. (I seem to have an un-curable weakness towards grumpy old men.)

Old men are the same everywhere. (I’ve watched them watching asphalt being laid, or a construction site, or in car repair shop — giving advice no one asked for, arguing fiercely over it, and then going fishing like nothing happened.)

Edit, some more edit (editing = iterating)
So, of course, the whole fiction needs to be taken apart like an old engine and rebuilt piece by piece (where are the old men when their advice is actually needed?).

A pain, yes. But also a privilege: I get to spend more

“Vulnerability is the next Super Power.”
Also in team building. (There is neuroscience behind it.)

time with the grumpy gang.

(And in case you wondered: yes, I do have some published novels, too.)

Lessons learned

  1. Always publish a novel about a pandemic before a pandemic. (Timing. Is. Everything.)

  2. Or, don’t write about global pandemics.

    Reality always outwrites fiction. (My editor keeps reminding me: fiction has to be believable — reality isn’t.)

    In design, the same applies: if your story doesn’t feel real, it probably isn’t. People feel it. (Again, science behind this.)

  3. Editing & iterating can save everything. Keep the good parts, throw out the rest.

How my stumbling might be useful to you
To me, editing a novel script is the same as any iteration in any project. Keep the functioning parts, throw out the rest. Repeat, until it all works.

  1. Radical Honesty Kick-off: There is neuroscience behind building a true team connection (yes, through vulnerability). Curious? Just ask.

  2. Story Architecture Sprint: I have taken so many stories into pieces, I can help you do that with your brand or strategy — ideally without repeating my mistakes.

There are some other things too, if you want to collaborate. Bring your curiosity, I’ll bring mine.

Or, if you are a geek like me, the architecture of a disgustingly well-written story (say Friends-episode) might tickle you – once you see the beauty of its structure, you can’t unsee it. It’s the kind of pattern-whispering you can carry into anything you build.

Why vulnerability?
Because we desperately need human connection. In the rising noise of synthetic content we need fiercely protect our… humanness.

Vulnerability? Isn’t it… well, too vulnerable?

Mostly it’s human.
Curious about my take on AI, or ethics? Or the actual published novels? Follow the typewriter.

Previous
Previous

06.Vision: Redesigning Societies